Dear Editor,
I am gravely concerned about the Labour Day issue’s article “Indian Communists
Debate Tamil Issue” in the People's Voice which states “Sri Lanka's Tamils were
largely brought from Tamil Nadu by the British as labourers.” Even the
chauvinist Sri Lankan government’s own census shows this is simply not true, the
last complete census (1989) shows Tamils who had been in Sri Lanka since ancient
times outnumbered Tamils brought by the British from India by over 2 to 1 (2.1
million vs under 1 million). As the CPI(M)’s Ramdass discussed in his article
“Developments in Sri Lanka” in the theoretical journal The Marxist (Vol. 3, No.
2, April-June 1985) “The Jaffna Tamils had emigrated to Sri Lanka, then Ceylon,
about 2000 years ago…. The root of the problem is that the Sinhalese consider
Sri Lanka to be their country where the Tamils have no business to be.”
Unfortunately the People’s Voice article not only suggests a misrepresentation
of the position of the Indian Communist Parties, let alone facts on the ground,
but does so in a way that plays right into the hands of the most reactionary
chauvinists.
As Ramdass explains, “What is generally referred to as the ‘ethnic problem’ is
in fact the problem of a minority nationality – the Sri Lanka Tamil people –
whose aspirations and legitimate demands have been denied by the ruling
classes.” Although the Indian communists are against Tamil separation, Ramdass
explains who has true responsibility for this demand: “But it should not be
forgotten that it is the refusal of successive bourgeois-landlord governments to
concede autonomy to the Tamil majority areas, the breaking or scuttling and
again of agreements arrived at that finally brought the separatist slogan to the
forefront.”
Two years ago thousands of Tamils, some waving LTTE (Liberation Tigers of Tamil
Elaam) flags, blockaded highways in Toronto to bring attention to the genocidal
war (CPI Tamil Nadu state secretary D. Pandian called it that in the party’s New
Age Weekly Jul. 9, 2011 “CPI for Solidarity with Sri Lankan Tamils”),
concentration-camp roundups of the Tamil people and, whether one agrees with
them or not, the leading force for their national liberation which is the LTTE.
The Canadian government targets for deportation Tamils who have ties to the LTTE
and the struggle for national liberation. We must refrain from any dodges on
the facts of nationhood and the principle of self-determination, whether abroad
or in Canada.
Sincerely,
Asad Ali
Niagara Falls, Ontario
This is the blog of the Eric Blair Club of the Communist Party of Canada in the Niagara Region and the Saleh Waziruddin election campaign for MPP St. Catharines in the 2018 Ontario general election. Authorized by CPC(O).
Showing posts with label Letter to the Editor. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Letter to the Editor. Show all posts
Monday, 31 October 2011
Letter to the editor (Peoples Voice) on Exploitation article
Dear Editor,
While Clarence Torcoran's “Who's exploited, and does it matter?” in the July issue's Marxist Theory section makes a good point that exploitation is about the relationship to accumulating capital and not the physical working conditions or pay, his claim that if some workers are exploited and others are not then this would mean capitalism can be reformed misses a major point of Marx's analysis. While the working class is exploited as a class, only workers who produce surplus value (anything commodified, including services) are exploited in the Marxist sense, and this matters because it shows us both the relationship between, for example, public sector and retail workers with manufacturing and service workers, and also helps us realize the true magnitude of the exploitation of the whole class. Marx observed in Theories of Surplus Value “What a convenient arrangement it is that makes a factory girl to sweat twelve hours in a factory, so that the factory proprietor, with a part of her unpaid labour, can take into his personal service her sister as maid, her brother as groom and her cousin as soldier or policeman!” The insight that some workers are exploited and their exploitation pays for the non-commodified services of other workers has nothing to do with one group of workers being more important or needing more reforms, but helps us to understand where the wealth that we produce as a class comes from so that we can take it back from the capitalists. Torocoran said as much in his People's Voice article "Wages facing downward pressure" five years ago ("Workers at the 'point of production' ... have the power to choke off the generation of profits")
S. Saleh Waziruddin
Niagara Falls, Ontario
While Clarence Torcoran's “Who's exploited, and does it matter?” in the July issue's Marxist Theory section makes a good point that exploitation is about the relationship to accumulating capital and not the physical working conditions or pay, his claim that if some workers are exploited and others are not then this would mean capitalism can be reformed misses a major point of Marx's analysis. While the working class is exploited as a class, only workers who produce surplus value (anything commodified, including services) are exploited in the Marxist sense, and this matters because it shows us both the relationship between, for example, public sector and retail workers with manufacturing and service workers, and also helps us realize the true magnitude of the exploitation of the whole class. Marx observed in Theories of Surplus Value “What a convenient arrangement it is that makes a factory girl to sweat twelve hours in a factory, so that the factory proprietor, with a part of her unpaid labour, can take into his personal service her sister as maid, her brother as groom and her cousin as soldier or policeman!” The insight that some workers are exploited and their exploitation pays for the non-commodified services of other workers has nothing to do with one group of workers being more important or needing more reforms, but helps us to understand where the wealth that we produce as a class comes from so that we can take it back from the capitalists. Torocoran said as much in his People's Voice article "Wages facing downward pressure" five years ago ("Workers at the 'point of production' ... have the power to choke off the generation of profits")
S. Saleh Waziruddin
Niagara Falls, Ontario
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)